Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Are grades a reflection of learning?

The inspiration for this month’s blog occurred Sunday night at about 10p.m. while I sat on the floor of my daughter’s bedroom—frustrated, sad, angry, and disillusioned.  Why the extreme emotions?  Why as I sat on the floor?  Just…why?

Annika is a pretty good reader.  She isn’t a fast reader, and neither am I, but she is a good reader.  She understands what she reads and can ask some good questions about the material once she is done.  Because she reads well, she has to meet an Accelerated Reader goal that is challenging.  Unfortunately, though, she doesn’t see this as an opportunity or an achievement; she sees it as a task—a job to be completed.  The joy of reading and losing herself in a book has been stripped by the demand to read books that add up to a certain number of points.  Her perspective has been changed by the grade attached to the assignment.

She started reading one of her American Girl books on Sunday afternoon.  A few pages into the book, she stopped, looked up the book on AR, and decided to quit reading then and there even though she had been enjoying the story.  Why?  Because the book wasn’t “worth enough points” in her estimation.  She didn’t see the value in reading a book that she felt didn’t help her reach her goal for the quarter quickly.  While I acknowledge that we all need to determine the value of continuing with a project, why are we quietly encouraging our students to only do a task if there is a reward or grade attached?  Why are we educating them out of learning?

Kids are naturally inquisitive; they want to learn.  But at some point in their educational lives, they lose that natural desire, and I believe they do so because they are more concerned about the grade than they are about the learning.  I have had seniors say, “Just tell me what I need to do to get an A.  I don’t care about anything else.”  Really?

So what do we do as classroom teachers and school leaders?  How do we put the learning back in education?

I believe standards based grading will help, but that alone doesn’t inspire inquisitiveness.  Problem-based learning is another methodology for which I have high hopes.  PBL allows students to demonstrate their learning through projects that they develop based on the objectives needing to be reached or the problem needing to be solved.  But like I discussed in the last blog, the true shift occurs in the whole paradigm of how schools grade and how society wants schools to grade.

The other idea that holds promise for me and could potentially bridge this gap is explained on pages 65 and 66 of Reeves’ book, Elements of Grading.  Here, he explains that assessments of standards can be converted into grades using a three-, four-, or five-point scale.  I especially appreciate his explanation of letter grades:

A=At least four assessments with a final score of 4 and two assessments with a final score of at least 3

B=At least four assessments with a final score of at least 3 and two assessments with a final score of at least 2

                C=At least three assessments with a final score of at least 3 (66).

I can easily see how I can convert this into something useable for essays, particularly if I break down the elements of the essay into separate assessments.  For example, I can assess structure and grammar; organizational techniques; content; and diction/voice separately and convert that to one grade.  This would also, hopefully, help students see which part of the essay needs improvement.  It won’t be perfect, but like a methods professor often told us: “If we had found the perfect method, we would be using it by now.  Until then, we have to keep working at it.”

 

While this concept of converting to standards based grading and blending it with traditional reporting methods isn’t without its pitfalls, it certainly is worthy of experimentation.  I am looking forward to the chance to examine the possibilities with student scores when I “play” with my gradebook this summer.  I want to see how these shifts affect real kids in real situations before I implement them in the classroom.

Grades need to assess learning.  (And a student who doesn’t turn in an assignment isn’t demonstrating learning.) I have become a firm believer in this statement while I acknowledge that making that shift in reality is challenging.  But I know it is essential to move toward a better system for everyone, including Annika.

4 comments:

  1. Todd Whitaker says, "Its about people not programs." Wow I didn't think about how AR can negatively impact a young reader. Jason made a good point about how we should just encourage any reading. Why put limits on students that discourage reading?

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I was a sixth grader we had timed math tests. You and another student would sit in front of the teacher as they would show you flash cards of different multiplication tables. Object of the game: if you know the answer, you yell it and you get the point if it’s correct. Don’t get me wrong, I am a very competitive person but I remember dreading those tests. I never complained: I sat there and tried my hardest. Because of that game I started to hate math and struggled with it all throughout high school because I could never meet that goal. Ultimately my goal was set by another student’s ability.
    I get asked all the time “how much is this worth”? I hate that question actually. I respond with “It doesn’t matter; you should work hard no matter if it’s worth 5 points or 50 points”. I have given rubrics to students before that just had the criteria but left out the point value. They really hate when I don’t tell them but what happened to doing something without expecting something for it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel your pain ~ those speed tests made my heart race, too! But, I think it is a personality thing, some kids love it and others hate it. I got the same heart race from shooting free throws and sneaking up on a person while playing paintball. I stressed out too much about it. On the other hand, I had a lot of friends who LOVED that game. It totally motivated them. They loved that rush for the answer and could calculate rapidly in their head and wanted to show it off. Likewise, I think AR has done a lot of good things for a sizeable section of students. I'm not saying that timed math facts and AR reading are the only way to learn math facts and practice reading, but they DO work wonderfully for many kids. The caution is that we do not only do it one way. I remember in my grade school classroom, we had many other ways to practice our math facts. So, if I did poorly at playing "around the world" speed math facts, but I was really good at playing the match game, it all sort of balanced out. A kid isn't going to love every single method we do. Some kids hate group work while others love it. Some kids love presenting to the class while it is torture for others. I think it is important to have kids do some stuff out of their comfort zone or not what they would choose first, while mixing it up with ways that they enjoy. Teachers and parents can really make a difference in encouraging kids to try new things and give the resounding chant that you don't have to do everything well, but you do have to try your best.
      Another comment on kids who work for the "points". I don't think we can eliminate this completely because it is so much a personality thing. All kids do not stop to calculate AR points, but some do. Some people like/need to know the score up front. I don't think it makes them unable to enjoy a task, but they probably do need to be encouraged to look past their first instinct and enjoy the ride, too!

      Delete
  3. I had never thought about AR reading like that before... It is disheartening to know that students could become less likely to read for pure enjoyment. It's going to be a journey figuring out what the best path is for future grading and assessment of standards. Hopefully when all is said and done we'll have a system that is much more positive and it will encourage students to want to learn what's next......

    ReplyDelete